Write out the dilemma, list who is affected, and say what you value. You get a stakeholder list, then three verdicts, utilitarian, deontological and Machiavellian, each with reasoning and a confidence rating, a tally of whether they agree, and action steps. You still make the call.
What you give it: The situation: your ethical dilemma described in detail (textarea, required), Who is involved, optional: the key people affected by the decision, Your values, optional: what matters most to you in this situation.
What you get back: The dilemma restated as one core ethical tension, A stakeholder list: each name or role, what they have at stake, how much influence they hold, Three verdicts, utilitarian, deontological and Machiavellian, each with a framework summary, analysis, reasoning and a High, Medium or Low confidence rating, A verdict tally, whether the three agree, and the key tension when they split, A synthesized recommendation with rationale, caveats and concrete action steps, plus one reflection question.
Free to run, with no payment at any point. One run a day without an account and five a day signed in.